Analisis Soal Ujian Tengah Semester (UTS) Mata Kuliah Geometri

Nurhasanah Nurhasanah, Herlina Ahmad

Abstract


This research aims to analyze the question of the mid term exam in geometry course. Focusing on the level of difficulty, validity, and reability. This research is evalution qualitative research conducting in mathematic education departement. The quantitative data that was taken from th answer sheet of students was analyzed by using descriptive statistic. The results revealed that: (1) the level difficulty of questions number 2, 3 is very hard and 5 is hard, number 1 is average, and number 4 is low , (2) the validity of all question ( number 1 through 5 ) is valid with different level of validity, (3) the reability of questions is in average, in terms of difficulty level, most questions are difficult, it is affected the reability of the items examination that is in average level.

Keywords


Analyze; Question; Geometry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto. 1988. Suharsimi, Penilaian Program Pendidikan.Jakarta : Depdikbud,.

Arikunto, 1990. Suharsimi, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Edisi pertama, Jakarta Depdikbud.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2012. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Edisi kedua.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Aiken, Lewis R, 1994. Psychological Testing and Assessment, Eight Edition, Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Dimyati & Mudjiono, 2009. Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Effiyaldi, 2009. Analisis validitas dan reliabilitas soal tes penerimaan mahasiswa baru pada STIKOM Dinamika Bangsa, Laporan Penelitian: Bandung: STIKOM.

Gronlund, Norman, 1985. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching, New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

Kunandar, 2013. Penilaian Autentik: Penilaian hasil belajar berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Mardalis, 1989. Metode Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Proposal, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Mulyasa, E, 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moleong, Lexy J, 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Nitko, Anthony J, 1996. Educational Assessment of Students, Second Edition, Ohio: Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs.

Nurkancana, W dan Sumartana, 1986. Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Purwanto, M. Ngalim, 2010. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purba, Th, 2004. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian, Jayapura : FKIP UNCEN.

Purba, Th, 2004. Evaluasi Kemampuan Bahasa Asing, Jayapura: FKIP UNCEN.

Sudjana, N, 1989. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono, 2006. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Penerbit Alfabet.

S. Verdu, 1998. Multi-user detection, Cambridge University Press.

Winkel, W.S, 1991. Psikologi Pengajaran, Jakarta: Grasindo.

Witherington, 1967. Psychological Education (Terjemahan M. Buchori, M.ED.) Bandung:Keluarga Bapemsi.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35329/fkip.v13i1.178

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 582 times | PDF - 561 times


Alamat Penyunting & Distribusi:

Pepatudzu : Media Pendidikan dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan
Gedung B1. Lt 1. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Al Asyariah Mandar
Telp./Fax (0428) 21038

Email: pepatudzujurnal@gmail.com

Website: https://journal.lppm-unasman.ac.id/index.php/apepatudzu/index

View Journal | Current Issue | Register

Penerbit:
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Al Asyariah Mandar


Indexed by:

   

   

Member of:

 

 

Creative Commons License
Pepatudzu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter

POSKOBET

POSKOBET

https://gurupantura.com/

SLOT GACOR

EMAS787

situs toto